JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 16, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Jose Alonso Garrido Abad

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 12 De Juno De 2008, Dictado Por La Doctora Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez, Mediante El Cual Se Rechazo La Demanda De La Referencia Porque Los Argumentos Expuestos En El Escrito De Correccion No Fueron Suficientes Para Estructurar Los Cargos De Inexequibilidad.  La Sala Confirma El Auto Suplicado Ante La Ausencia De La Correccion Ordenada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por cuanto el recurso de súplica no presenta argumentos que desvirtúen las razones constitutivas del rechazo de la demanda
  • Inexistencia de argumentación, razonamiento o motivación
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. CONFIRMAR el auto dictado el 12 de Junio de 2008 por la Magistrada Sustanciadora, Dra. Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez, por medio del cual rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada por el ciudadano Jorge Alonso Garrido Abad en el proceso de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.